•  
  •  
 

Washington Law Review

Abstract

The Patent Act of 1952 introduced the nonobviousness requirement into patentability analysis. Historically vague, the nonobviousness requirement remains poorly defined. Courts currently use a variety of tests for nonobviousness, none of which correctly reflects the requirement's constitutional and technical role. This Comment proposes a functional standard embodying four elements: constitutional policy, technical advance, logical analysis, and active perspective.

First Page

1061

Share

COinS