QUESTION PRESENTED The court of appeals concluded that a reasonable jury could find that actions by supervisors at the Idaho Department of Corrections created a hostile work environment. Petitioner does not seek review of that holding. The question presented is: Did the court of appeals err in concluding that the record contained sufficient evidence to permit a reasonable jury to infer that the actions of those supervisors were gender-based?
Eric Schnapper, Ericka Birch, and Kass Hartstad, Brief in Opposition. Idaho Department of Corrections v. Fuller, 138 S.Ct. 1345 (2018) (No. 17-959) (2018), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-court-briefs/36