Washington Law Review
Abstract
When the police wrongfully arrest someone, that person faces distinct harms. Various scholarship, news articles, and studies document that AI-powered facial recognition technology (FRT) disproportionately misidentifies individuals from marginalized racial groups when used irresponsibly. Many of those sources indicate that police reliance on FRT without adequate vetting results in wrongful arrests. Yet law enforcement continues to misuse FRT.
This Comment contends that the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 state-created danger doctrine offers a potential remedy for plaintiffs harmed by police reliance on FRT. To prevail under this doctrine, plaintiffs must prove affirmative conduct, deliberate indifference, and proximate causation. If successful, these claims may provide a limited means to hold officers accountable in the absence of the uniform legislation needed to fully address the issue.
First Page
337
Recommended Citation
Esha Jain,
Comment,
Facing State-Created Danger in Facial Recognition Technology,
101 Wash. L. Rev.
337
(2026).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol101/iss1/10
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Litigation Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons