Washington Law Review
Abstract
When Elnmendorf-Anthony Co. v. Dunn was decided in August, 1941, it completed the law of future advances on mortgages in this jurisdiction. The case dealt with the problem of optional advances by the mortgagee, and the effect of intervening encumbrances upon such advances. Perhaps it will be well to show the fact situation in order to see the problem more clearly.
First Page
24
Recommended Citation
John B. Krilich,
Comment,
Future Advances on Mortgages in Washington,
18 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J.
24
(1943).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol18/iss1/3