Washington Law Review
Abstract
The Committee on Juvenile Delinquency has heretofore gone on record, probably, that it did not recommend Initiative 175, which is the Youth Protection Act. The two primary reasons are: (1) the Committee members felt that at least a portion of it was unconstitutional; and (2) the proposed program—or rather set-up—did not lay down a constructive program of any kind.
First Page
337
Recommended Citation
Ronald R. Hull,
State Bar Journal,
Report of Committee on Institutions and Juvenile Delinquency,
25 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J.
337
(1950).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol25/iss4/5