Washington Law Review
Abstract
The purpose of this comment is threefold: (1) to reformulate the Washington rules in re peaceful picketing in light of Ostroff v. Laundry and Dye Works Drivers' Local No. 566; (2) to suggest, using the metaphor employed by Judge Hamley in his dissenting opinion, that the rule of the Ostroff case embarks the court on a voyage into uncharted seas; and (3) to suggest further the wisdom of the court's returning to port and recharting a course over better marked and more frequently traveled waters.
First Page
169
Recommended Citation
Donald H. Wollett,
Another Look at Picketing in Washington,
26 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J.
169
(1951).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol26/iss3/3