Washington Law Review
Abstract
The purpose of this comment is to survey some of the Washington statutes and case authorities which involve notice, and to discuss them in reference to a number of recent United States Supreme Court decisions involving procedural due process considerations. It is believed that a broadened scope and meaning have been attached to "notice," as a requirement of procedural due process. This survey has been confined to the areas categorized as proceedings in rem, but it is not exhaustive of them.
First Page
165
Recommended Citation
George O'Dea,
Comment,
Adequacy of Notice—Due Process,
32 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J.
165
(1957).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol32/iss2/22