Administrative Law—Standing to Challenge Constitutionality of Loyalty Oath

Authors

David C. Lycette

Abstract

In Nostrand v. Little, the Washington State Supreme Court had an opportunity to pass on the much publicized loyalty oath required of certain state employees. Against a charge that procedural due process was violated because the statute calls for immediate dismissal upon non-compliance, the court found that the oath abridged no constitutional rights of the plaintiffs, two University of Washington professors.

First Page

106

Recommended Citation

David C. Lycette, Washington Case Law, Administrative Law—Standing to Challenge Constitutionality of Loyalty Oath, 37 Wash. L. Rev. 106 (1962).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol37/iss2/2