Washington Law Review
Abstract
May mental irresponsibility be an effective defense in disciplinary proceedings brought against an attorney? The Washington court answered in the affirmative in the recent case of In re Sherman, setting forth the requirements for such a defense.
First Page
114
Recommended Citation
Evan L. Schwab,
Washington Case Law,
Attorney-Client—Disciplinary Proceedings—Mental Competency,
37 Wash. L. Rev.
114
(1962).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol37/iss2/3