Equal Protection, Affirmative Action and Racial Preferences in Law Admissions: De Funis v. Odegaard

Authors

Arval A. Morris, University of Washington School of Law

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the constitutional dimensions of the equal protection problem presented by a law school's voluntary adoption of racial classifications in a preferential admissions policy, and to do so, in part, by focusing on the recent case of De Funis v. Odegaard.

First Page

1

Recommended Citation

Arval A. Morris, Equal Protection, Affirmative Action and Racial Preferences in Law Admissions: De Funis v. Odegaard, 49 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (1973).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol49/iss1/2