Washington Law Review
Abstract
The district court accepted Almota's theory of valuation, but was reversed by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Supreme Court reinstated the district court's judgment. Held: Just compensation for a leasehold bearing improvements owned by the lessee is measured by what a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller for the leasehold, taking into account the possibility of renewal. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 470 (1973).
First Page
195
Recommended Citation
Mark W. Pennak,
Recent Developments,
Constitutional Law—Eminent Domain—Just Compensation for a Lessee's Renewal Expectation—Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 470 (1973),
50 Wash. L. Rev.
195
(1974).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol50/iss1/10