This comment advances the argument—herein referred to as the principle of equivalence—that because these trial and commitment proceedings are analytically more similar than different, the same standards of due process should be applied to each.
Stephen E. Oliver,
Mental Commitment and the Principle of Equivalence,
51 Wash. L. Rev.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol51/iss3/14