Washington Law Review
Abstract
This comment will describe the statutory scheme for rescission and restoration, identify where and why interpretive problems arise, summarize the judicial approaches to these problems, and analyze those approaches in relation to the stated purposes of the Act.
First Page
301
Recommended Citation
Janis K. Stanich,
Comment,
Consumer Protection: Judicial Approaches to Rescission and Restoration Under the Truth in Lending Act,
53 Wash. L. Rev.
301
(1978).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol53/iss2/5