Washington Law Review
Abstract
Traditional legal mechanisms have failed to protect minority cultural integrity rights for the Tibetan people. Modem human rights law, however, offers a mechanism to protect cultural integrity through group autonomy. This Comment argues that the right to development can protect Tibetan cultural rights through such a claim for group autonomy over development.
First Page
695
Recommended Citation
Michele L. Radin,
Comment,
The Right to Development as a Mechanism for Group Autonomy: Protection of Tibetan Cultural Rights,
68 Wash. L. Rev.
695
(1993).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol68/iss3/6