Insulating Sexual Harassment Grievance Procedures from the Chilling Effect of Defamation Litigation

Authors

Ruth A. Kennedy

Abstract

The threat of defamation liability may undermine the push to encourage private employers to establish internal grievance procedures for handling sexual harassment complaints. Courts have recognized two defenses to defamation claims arising out of employers' sexual harassment investigations: the qualified privilege and the intracorporate immunity rule. Neither of these defenses adequately balances the need to insulate grievance procedures against the desire to protect the reputation of the employee accused of harassment. This Comment proposes the adoption of a new grievance procedure privilege which would ensure the integrity of grievance procedures while maximizing the protection afforded an accused employee.

First Page

235

Recommended Citation

Ruth A. Kennedy, Notes and Comments, Insulating Sexual Harassment Grievance Procedures from the Chilling Effect of Defamation Litigation, 69 Wash. L. Rev. 235 (1994).
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol69/iss1/10