This essay makes a simple point: When a law review publishes an article, the editors should be willing both to publish responses to that article and to give the author a chance to reply to critics. This shouldn't be a controversial principle, but, for far too many reviews today, it's not standard procedure.
Erik M. Jensen,
Law Reviews and Academic Debate,
77 Wash. L. Rev.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol77/iss3/4