Washington Law Review
Abstract
Under Washington State’s historic default rules, the civil jury consisted of twelve persons unless both parties expressly consented to a “less number.” The Washington Legislature reversed this presumption in 1972. Washington’s civil jury now consists of six persons, unless one of the parties files a specific demand for twelve. It appears, however, that litigants have refused to embrace this change; a survey of 2883 civil jury demands filed in King County Superior Court in 2009 to 2010 demonstrates that litigants overwhelmingly prefer twelve-member juries. This paper presents this survey’s results and explores what they might mean, positing seven considerations that may explain litigants’ shared preference for traditional juries. I hope that the survey and accompanying exploration will remind us of the “great purposes that gave rise to the jury in the first place.”
First Page
237
Recommended Citation
M. M. Dunning,
Essay,
Discernable Differences: A Survey of Civil Jury Demands,
87 Wash. L. Rev.
237
(2012).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol87/iss1/7