Publication Title

Wisconsin Law Review

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Elections do not operate in perfect compliance with the law. Instead, irregularities are routine and, to some extent, inevitable. The law of elections responds to this tension by recognizing that only some legal irregularities, under only some circumstances, have even the potential to invalidate an electoral process. One manifestation of this response involves variable standards of compliance. Doctrines implicated by these standards recognize that some election rules require only substantial compliance, rather than strict compliance, to be considered fulfilled. These compliance standards serve a vital role in election law regimes across the country. The basic operation of these standards is, moreover, intuitively sensible. Nevertheless, the case law surrounding these distinctions tends to be analytically tortuous. The convoluted nature of these precedents is due in part to the complexity and diversity of election law regimes across the country, in part to imprecision in how courts and litigants discuss these concepts, and in part to tensions between these compliance standards and the rise of textualism, which in recent decades has become the governing methodology for statutory interpretation. This Essay describes the need for these compliance standards in elections, a reality reflected in their long pedigree in the case law. It then explores how and why the doctrine surrounding these standards poses so many challenges. Finally, this Essay concludes by reiterating the need for these standards and offering suggestions for improvement.

Included in

Election Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.