Publication Title

Wisconsin Law Review

Keywords

right to jury trial in civil actions, Seventh Amendment

Document Type

Article

Abstract

This Article seeks to assess the treatment of civil jury verdicts by the federal courts of appeals during the two decades in which the Supreme Court has refused to scrutinize the actions of the circuit courts. Part I summarizes the manner in which the Supreme Court, prior to 1968, aggressively enforced the seventh amendment. Part II, focusing on a one-year period between the fall of 1984 and the fall of 1985, describes the actions of the courts of appeals in resolving the 208 reported cases in which a party challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury verdict. That analysis demonstrates that appellate reversals of jury factfinding, once a relatively rare event, are now occurring in almost half of all such federal civil appeals. Part III describes the standards currently being utilized by federal appellate courts in passing on requests for judgments nonobstante veredicto (judgment n.o.v.) and explains how those standards diverge from pre-1968 Supreme Court precedents. Part IV discusses the criteria now relied on by the appellate courts in overturning jury verdicts as excessive and analyzes the manner in which those criteria differ from the approach that prevailed prior to 1968.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.