United States v. Nwoye (judgment)
Editor(s)
Bennett Capers, Sarah Deer and Corey Rayburn Yung
Files
Download Full Text
Description
The case represents one of the few instances where an appellate court considered whether an affirmative defense of duress should be allowed to incorporate evidence of battered person syndrome. The defendant, convicted of conspiring with her boyfriend to extort money from a doctor, testified that her boyfriend coerced her participation through his physically and emotionally abusive behavior. He also pretended to be an FBI agent which allowed the defendant to argue she did not feel reasonably safe in reporting the extortion scheme. Also of note, the case had an unusual procedure history wherein a three-judge panel reversed its prior judgment and the final split opinion was authored by Judge (now Justice) Brett Kavanaugh.
Title of Book
Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
ISBN
9781009091978
Publication Date
12-2022
Document Type
Book Chapter
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
City
Cambridge
Keywords
Coercion, Criminal law, Duress, Evidence, Feminist jurisprudence
Disciplines
Criminal Law | Evidence | Judges | Law and Gender | Public Law and Legal Theory
Recommended Citation
Mary D. Fan,
United States v. Nwoye (judgment), in
Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
(Bennett Capers, Sarah Deer and Corey Rayburn Yung eds., 2022).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-chapters/39